• Home
  • Diocese
  • Bishop Burns
  • Synod
  • Columnists
  • Revista Catolica
  • Vatican
  • Subscribe
The Texas Catholic
The Texas Catholic

Dallas, Texas

Today is Monday, March 20, 2023
  • Home
  • Diocese
  • Bishop Burns
  • Synod
  • Columnists
  • Revista Catolica
  • Vatican
  • Subscribe
  • Follow
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linkedin
    • Instagram
Home
Word To Enkindle

Father Bayer: Contraception in Scientific American

Saturday, September 21, 2019

By Father John Bayer
Special to The Texas Catholic

I was pleasantly surprised earlier this summer when I saw confirmed in the prestigious journal Scientific American (May 2019) something I had often heard from some Catholics: namely, the hormonal contraceptives that our society offers millions of women have a rather dubious origin and an even more questionable future.

In an age like ours, I should be prudent when writing about such an issue. And so, dear reader, I promise to do my very best to go no further than the author of the article I read in Scientific American. It was written by Virginia Sole-Smith, who, according to her biography at the beginning of the article, is “a journalist who writes about feminism, body image and health for the New York Times Magazine, Harper’s Magazine, Elle and many other publications.” (34). In what follows, I try to present significant points from her article.

Sole-Smith writes with some indignation about the cultural and clinical ignorance affecting women’s health, particularly with regard to menstruation. Senior Editors Clara Moskowitz and Jen Schwartz, who introduce the article by Sole-Smith, summarize her piece by saying, “Having periods is not a disease. But when they go wrong, they offer clues into disorders that require intervention. The medical field has largely done a poor job of identifying and treating them with precision. Clinicians tend to wield synthetic hormones like a hammer, liberally prescribing the birth-control pill for all kinds of pain – which is partly why serious diseases of the female organs such as endometriosis take an average of eight years to be diagnosed.” (31).

How did we arrive to a situation where relatively little is known about menstruation and where pills are too quickly prescribed to control it? Sole-Smith explains, “By the late 1950s research around menstruation had shifted to center almost entirely on preventing unplanned pregnancies” (35). Thus, research shifted to correspond with social concerns. Initially, the researchers studied a small group of American women, but then they went “to Puerto Rico to run the first large-scale trial of the drug that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration would approve in 1960 as the first oral contraceptive. They recruited 265 Puerto Rican women, many of them poor, to the study without the level of ‘informed consent’ required today.” The results were not promising: “Twenty-two percent of the participants dropped out after reporting side effects such as nausea, dizziness, headaches and vomiting. The study’s medical director argued that the pill ‘caused too many side reactions to be generally acceptable.’ Nevertheless, it went to market.” (35). As Sole-Smith notes, the pill was celebrated as a watershed for women’s liberation. “But liberation came with a price. By the late 1960s patients across the U.S. were reporting the same symptoms documented during the Puerto Rican trial. Despite many reformulations over the ensuing decades, side effects remain a problem for many women on the pill; risks for breast cancer, blood clots and stroke may also be higher.” (35).

The risks may be even higher whenever the pill is prescribed in order to suppress a women’s cycle indefinitely. As Sole-Smith states, we do not know what the consequences are for women who fill their bodies with synthetic hormones for extended periods of time: “Nobody knows for sure what that exposure to synthetic hormones will mean long term for women using the pill to suppress their cycles indefinitely.” Citing a certain researcher, she writes, “Kissling says, ‘What we have now’ with women using birth control for long-term suppression ‘is the largest uncontrolled medical experiment on women in history.’” (40).

Moreover, turning the pill into a mainstream cultural right missed an opportunity for women’s health: for, “scientists figured out how to supplant periods long before they began trying to understand why they work the way they do.” (35-36). This is, I think, an example of how science and technology get into trouble when they are mixed with the winds of a momentary ideology. Obviously, I’m not a doctor, but I do know serious doctors who are suspicious of hormonal contraceptives, and who, more positively, are filled with genuine wonder when studying the female body and its reproductive systems. Some of these doctors have been diligently researching this aspect of women’s health for decades at the Saint Paul VI Institute in Omaha, NE, when much of the scientific community had lost interest. From what I have read and heard of their work, there are real scientific, medical and personal rewards for exploring this research.

If someone is skeptical that this negative light on contraception sounds too convenient, since it is coming from a Catholic priest, I would respond by saying that I cite here Scientific American – hardly a journal of ultra-conservative Catholics! Moreover, there are other secular organizations interested in this precisely because it is a women’s issue, not a Catholic issue. See, for example, www.iirrm.org, www.naturalwomanhood.org, or www.factsaboutfertility.org (Facts About Fertility will even have a conference in Dallas on October 12). Admittedly, I do take a particular interest in the matter as a Catholic, since I find it an edifying thought that Catholic faith and moral teaching actually correspond with the natural good of our bodies.

Father John Bayer, O.Cist., is a theologian and monk at the Cistercian Abbey of Our Lady of Dallas in Irving. His column appears occasionally in The Texas Catholic.

  • Tags
  • Faith
  • Father John Bayer
  • Word to Enkindle
Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest
Next article Father Gollob: Memories of fall, state fairs and family
Previous article Father Dankasa: A life without God: A ‘Titanic’ moment to avoid

Related Posts

Father Esposito: Happiness as the blessed life Columnists
Friday, March 10, 2023

Father Esposito: Happiness as the blessed life

Father Dankasa: Two voices in one Columnists
Thursday, March 9, 2023

Father Dankasa: Two voices in one

Prayerfully using Lenten seeds for Easter growth Columnists
Friday, March 3, 2023

Prayerfully using Lenten seeds for Easter growth

Texas Catholic Classics

A look at the five Dallas law enforcement officers who gave their lives while protecting citizens during a mass shooting in downtown Dallas in July 2016.

 

How a child with special needs inspired a high school volleyball team, community and a family who heeded God’s call to protect life.

 

After a young runner collapsed at a Dallas marathon, grace and providence unfolded for those involved in the valiant effort to help her.

   

In the summer of 2016, 50 students and 25 chaperones from Dallas Catholic high schools traveled to Nicaragua for a 10-day mission trip.

 

Early on a November morning, Kenndrick Mendieta bounded from the gym at Cristo Rey Dallas College Prep toward the campus’ athletic fields as clouds lifted on a fresh new day.

 

Subscribe

Get the award-winning Texas Catholic delivered to your door. Use the menu below to subscribe now.


Subscription length




 

Photo Gallery

Click here to find your favorite Texas Catholic photographs.

The Texas Catholic Newspaper

Catholic Diocese of Dallas
Michael Gresham, Editor

3725 Blackburn Street
Dallas, Texas 75219
(214) 379-2800

Our Affiliated Sites

Texas Catholic Youth

Revista Católica

Legal and Other

Contact us

Terms of service

Privacy policy

Site map

Site powered by TexasCatholicMedia

© 2013-2019 The Texas Catholic Publishing Company. All rights reserved.